The premise is that you'll use bx_console N, E, or G on every channel of your mix session to build a virtual model of the chosen console. The channels are numbered, and assignable to any instantiation of the plug-in. Using TMT, Brainworx supplies each of these plug-ins with 72 analog-style variations, as would have happened with 72 real analog channels. All three versions of bx_console incorporate TMT. Isn't that great? Brainworx says, no, not really, because channel-to-channel variance contributes to the huge sound of the old giant consoles of decades past. With digital models, we get exact channel-matching for free. This issue has long been the bane of analog circuit designers.

Differences are usually subtle but sometimes not. This is a significant effort for a stereo pair, and practically impossible for a large console. The idea is that, due to the realities of variances in electrical components, no two manufactured units of audio equipment ever sound exactly the same, unless a painstaking process of hunting and testing every component for an exactly matched value is undertaken.

That review is available online, so I will summarize what blew my mind about it - Brainworx patent-pending Tolerance Modeling Technology (TMT). I reviewed the first version of bx_console which is re-manifested as bx_console N. Here's a hint: It's solid state, it's logical, and you get 4000 guesses. Clearly Brainworx are avoiding use of someone's brandname here, for reasons that didn't take much internet sleuthing. The Brainworx bx_console N, E, and G plug-ins are predicated on accurate digital models of the channel strips from Neve VXS, and 'British' E and G Series consoles.

Waves ssl 4000 vs uad ssl